Why put the North No 10 in Manchester and not Rotherham?

 The King of the North seems to want to put his devolved No 10 in Manchester - presumably for an easy commute. 

Why Manchester and not Rotherham or Leeds?

Manchester does have a high productivty rating - because of the Busy Bee population of Manchester - but the top performing town/city is Slough. Why not put No 10 there?

Leeds is a vibrant fast growing city.  Excellent transport links which would allow access from around the country being more central than London.

Rotherham is the fastest growing town in the UK in the last decade. Why not put No 10 there?

I guess the commute for Andy is less convenient....

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rachel planning to charge National Insurance on rental income

 The rumour mill is that Rachel is considering introducing National Insurance on rental income. How ironic! For as long as I can remember, the government and HMRC stance is that rental income is not earned income and therefore it has consequences in how it is taxed and treated. For example you can't use rental income to make pension contributions (that can only be from earned income).   Also unearned income bubbles to the top of the tax stack (order of taxation) so is most likely to treated at the highest level of income tax.  By making rental income (hopefully profits rather than income) subject to national insurance it will almost certainly have unintended consequences.  Firstly if you are past State Pension age you dont pay National Insurance. it would therefore open up the government to litigation if they make rental income subject to National Insurance for OAPs.  I can just see the negative headlines ! It is estimated that there are 1 Million Buy to Le...
Read more

Energy Performance of Privately Rent Properties - expect crazy things as we approach 2028

 The wonderful Labour government has very generously given private Landlords until 2030 to improve the energy performance of rental properties to an EPC of C for incumbent tenants.  For new tenants they need to achieve this by 2028. I agree with the idea of energy efficiency in the home but it needs to be economically viable. Ignoring the fact that the EPC scoring system  is a work of fiction (for example installing triple glazed windows doesnt improve scores) I thought it would be interesting to work through the financial side of the EPC targets.  Social and council tenants currently do not have EPC targets of E (the current minimum for private landlords) although Labour seem to be suggesting that there won't be a 2 Tier system and that council and social landlords will also have to achieve C by 2030 (previously it was 2050 to achieve E). Although I suspect the council and social landlords wont have huge fines if they fail to achieve C.  Anyway it seems  c...
Read more

Rayner's attack on Landlords. TIme to rebalance the relationship in favour of Landlords.

 Exit anti-Landlord Conservative - only to be replaced by the very anti-Landlord Labour.  Government attacks on Landlords are set to continue. This feels like this Zombie attack cannot die. Angela Rayner makes unqualified statements about their forthcoming equivalent to the Renter Reform Bill such as “rebalance the relationship between tenant and landlord.".   Really? The law favours the Tenant way more than the Landlord. I thought it would be interesting to go through just how imbalanced things have got and how easy it is for a Landlord to get fined and get a CRIMINAL record. Let's start with the basics.  If a property has gas then the Landlord has to have a gas safety certificate.  Failing to get a gas safety certificate is a £6,000 fine and  a CRIMINAL record and potentially 6 months in prison.  This is not if the system is unsafe or kills someone.  Simply to not have the paperwork.  Most home owners do not have annual checks on ...
Read more