Chagos deal is arse about face

 Qweir Squirmer states he can't back out of the Chagos treaty as it's been signed.

Surely Squirmer who allegedly has a law degree would remember first year law school where the process of law is explained and that ceding territory needs to be ratified by the king - in other words approved by parliament.

Just because he signed a treaty does not give him absolute authority and the treaty is subject to parliamentary approval.

Telling parliament that they must approve it because he signed it is arse about face.

Any lawyer will tell you when writing a contract, and a treaty is just a contract, that you should cover all eventualities. The treaty should be wholly conditional on parliamentary approval. 

 Secondly I am hearing rumours that the treaty doesn't have other provisions or convenants for example preventing Mauritius from selling Chagos to China. Also I am hearing we still need to pay regardless  whether Diego Garcia is still there and payments are still due even if the asset is fully or partially disposed of.  Contract novation seems to have been forgotten. More like contract No Va (don't go).

Jacob Rees Mogg has apparently stated that the legal act used for the treaty is the wrong one and therefore legally questionable.

I think the king needs to step in and sort this mess out.

I strongly believe Squirmer is a faux lawyer and should be put in the tower for treason.

This builds upon my previous article questioning whether he has any legal qualifications 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rachel planning to charge National Insurance on rental income

 The rumour mill is that Rachel is considering introducing National Insurance on rental income. How ironic! For as long as I can remember, the government and HMRC stance is that rental income is not earned income and therefore it has consequences in how it is taxed and treated. For example you can't use rental income to make pension contributions (that can only be from earned income).   Also unearned income bubbles to the top of the tax stack (order of taxation) so is most likely to treated at the highest level of income tax.  By making rental income (hopefully profits rather than income) subject to national insurance it will almost certainly have unintended consequences.  Firstly if you are past State Pension age you dont pay National Insurance. it would therefore open up the government to litigation if they make rental income subject to National Insurance for OAPs.  I can just see the negative headlines ! It is estimated that there are 1 Million Buy to Le...
Read more

Energy Performance of Privately Rent Properties - expect crazy things as we approach 2028

 The wonderful Labour government has very generously given private Landlords until 2030 to improve the energy performance of rental properties to an EPC of C for incumbent tenants.  For new tenants they need to achieve this by 2028. I agree with the idea of energy efficiency in the home but it needs to be economically viable. Ignoring the fact that the EPC scoring system  is a work of fiction (for example installing triple glazed windows doesnt improve scores) I thought it would be interesting to work through the financial side of the EPC targets.  Social and council tenants currently do not have EPC targets of E (the current minimum for private landlords) although Labour seem to be suggesting that there won't be a 2 Tier system and that council and social landlords will also have to achieve C by 2030 (previously it was 2050 to achieve E). Although I suspect the council and social landlords wont have huge fines if they fail to achieve C.  Anyway it seems  c...
Read more

Rayner's attack on Landlords. TIme to rebalance the relationship in favour of Landlords.

 Exit anti-Landlord Conservative - only to be replaced by the very anti-Landlord Labour.  Government attacks on Landlords are set to continue. This feels like this Zombie attack cannot die. Angela Rayner makes unqualified statements about their forthcoming equivalent to the Renter Reform Bill such as “rebalance the relationship between tenant and landlord.".   Really? The law favours the Tenant way more than the Landlord. I thought it would be interesting to go through just how imbalanced things have got and how easy it is for a Landlord to get fined and get a CRIMINAL record. Let's start with the basics.  If a property has gas then the Landlord has to have a gas safety certificate.  Failing to get a gas safety certificate is a £6,000 fine and  a CRIMINAL record and potentially 6 months in prison.  This is not if the system is unsafe or kills someone.  Simply to not have the paperwork.  Most home owners do not have annual checks on ...
Read more